Persuasive paper,first Draft, writing homework help

Because good writing is always a process, our persuasive essay will
be written in two parts: a first draft due this week and a final draft
due in week 6. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length.

As you prepare, here are a few reminders for this week’s draft:

1. In week 3 you posted a thesis for peer review. Use the revised
   thesis, based on your classmates’ and teacher’s feedback as the basis
   for your persuasive paper.

1. Use your sources to support your thesis. Research and prepare the
   passages you will consider using. Remember to review methods of
   paraphrasing, summarizing, and using direct quotations.

1. Prepare the body paragraphs by deciding where to place supporting
   information. Remember, each paragraph of the paper should act to build
   the momentum of the argument.

1. Apply pathos, logos, and ethos whenever possible.

1. Finally, remember that it’s okay if your ideas, opinions, or sources
   change during process of writing this paper. Writing makes us think,
   and it’s fine – even beneficial – to have our thoughts change as we
   express them on paper.

My thesis was the following

Topic Selection

The topic that I finally choose is;
Interpreters in court do/do not influence verdicts and sentencing.
Interpreters play a key role in the course of the hearing of cases, and
thus they are likely to influence the sentence given and the verdict of
the case. Since the interpreters are humans, they may deliberately or
unknowingly distort the meaning from the parties or the magistrate/
Judge. I would like to conduct a research to find out if court
interpreters influence the verdict of cases and sentences given.

Thesis development

My
take in this topic is that indeed, court interpreters influence the
case verdict and sentences given. This perspective will form the
foundations for my thesis. My research will therefore be aimed to
present sufficient facts to prove the thesis that court interpreters
influence the verdict of cases.

Thesis

To
improve the efficiency of the judicial system in the United States, the
Judiciary should sufficiently train its court interpreters to be able
to communicate the message from the source to the audience without
distortion.