How to improve logistic sustainability

/in /by

ASSIGNMENT 3: CASE STUDY

page18image4280834576

Due date:
Time:
Value:
Length:
Based on:

Sunday, 27 May 2018
23:59 hours (Australian Eastern Standard Time)
25%
2000 words ± 10%
Modules 8-10
Learning outcomes 1-3
Electronically through MyLO Assignment submission folder

Submission:
Before attempting this assignment:

page18image4280880448

Ensure the ‘Assessment’ section in this Unit Outline is read and understood. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact the lecturer.

Students should refer to the ‘Guide to Assessment’ file under the Content tab on the unit MyLO
site for guidelines on assignment presentation.

Ensure you understand the assignment question(s) and/or tasks. Once again, consult your
lecturer should you be unsure of any matters.

Note: All students are required to submit this assignment to be eligible to undertake the final
unit examination.

Task description & requirements

Complete the following task based on the attached case study Honeycutt Warehouse and
Shipping Corporation (Wisner et al., 2019), knowledge learned in this unit and other relevant
information.

Explain in details the tools, programmes or partnerships that Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping
Corporation can use to improve logistics sustainability.

[25 marks]

See the Essay/report assessment criteria sheet on the following page for information about the
criteria and the standards by which your work will be judged.

page18image4280971648

Department of Maritime and Logistics Management – JNB522 Business Logistics 18

Case: Honeycutt Warehouse and Shipping Corporation

page19image4280847424

page19image4280853696

page19image4280853920

Source: Wisner, JD, Tan, K-C & Leong, GK 2019, Principles of supply chain management – a
balanced approach, 5th edn, Cengage, Boston, MA.

Department of Maritime and Logistics Management – JNB522 Business Logistics 19

Student:
Unit code: JNB522
Assessor: Vera Zhang

Unit title: Business Logistics

ID:
Mark: / 25

Assignment 3 Marking Rubric

Assessment
Criteria*

HD
(High distinction)

DN
(Distinction)

CR
(Credit)

PP
(Pass)

page20image4282091184

NN
(Fail)

Explain the tools,
programmes or
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability

Clearly explain
with justification
the potential
tools/
programmes/
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability with
external resources
thoroughly
researched and
effectively applied

Well explain with
justification the
potential tools/
programmes/
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability with
external resources
mostly researched
and applied

Mostly explain with
justification the
potential tools/
programmes/
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability with
external resources
reasonably
researched and
applied

Partially/Shallowly
explain with
justification the
potential tools/
programmes/
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability with
limited or external
resources

Fail to identify
and analyse the
potential tools/
programmes/
partnerships to
improve logistics
sustainability
with effective
external
resources
overlooked or
misunderstood

Quality of research

All relevant
concepts etc
clearly explained

Evidence of wide
reading &
independent
research

Main concepts etc
covered and clearly
explained

Range of resources
used with
discrimination

page20image4282213664

Main concepts etc
covered but some
not clearly
explained

Reasonable use of
some quality
resources

A number of
important
concepts etc
overlooked or
insufficiently
described

Limited use of
some quality
resources

page20image4281198496

page20image4281199360

Majority of key
concepts not
addressed or
misunderstood

Little/no
evidence of use
of resources

Quality of
Communication

Logical structure
with coherent,
concise well
developed
argument

Correct use of
grammar and
technically error-
free

Acknowledged all
sources

Faultless
application of
prescribed style

Well organised
structure with
argument, mostly
logical, concise and
coherent

Mostly correct use
of grammar and
error-free

Acknowledge main
sources

Mostly accurate
referencing

Prescribed style
applied mostly
correct

page20image4282235312

Well organised
structure and
argument, generally
logical, concise and
coherent

Some mistakes in
the use of grammar
and technical errors

Acknowledge some
sources

Reasonably
accurate
referencing

Prescribed style
basically applied
with numerous
errors

Generally
organised
structure and in
some areas
argument illogical
and unclear

Numerous
grammar mistakes
and technical
errors

Acknowledge few
sources

Significantly
inconsistent
referencing

Inconsistent
application of
prescribed style

page20image4282282704

Poor structure
and argument
generally illogical
and unclear

Difficult to read
due to
grammatical and
technical errors

Sources poorly
acknowledged

Incorrect
referencing style

Incorrect
prescribed style

* Please note that the criteria listed above are not necessarily of equal weighting, nor are they all-inclusive; they give an
indication of your performance.

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

If you are looking for a similar or different assignment contact us for help by placing an order anonymously and it will be delivered in time.

Get Started & Get it within 6 Hours Order & Get it within 12 Hours

You can trust us for this and even for your future projects